Science

Disqualifies itself

As a voice of reason

Proof and verifiability

By clinging to

An unprovable cliche

As its go to theory

(Much like religion)

That everything

Came from nothing

Save for a microscopic dot

That exploded once and

Made a very loud noise

Most often referred to as

“The Big Bang”

None of which Science can

Point to any proof of at all

Save for an accepted theory



Even within the scope of

The observable universe

Which is said to be 90 million

Light years across in any

Direction from the Pale Blue Dot

(That is a big f’n area)

And within that big, mostly space

Absolutely zero evidence, hmmm

It’s just an underlying verbal tic

Regurgitated and repeated as if

To convince themselves it is true



If science wanted to redeem itself

It would declare that everything exists infinitely

After all, there is proof of that everywhere

The same goes for religion

It likewise could state that all is God

You, me, space, voids, vacuums, light,

Cats, dogs, electricity, water, air,

Lakes, deserts, mountains, valleys,

Hospitals, prisons, guns, schools, etc.





I am a whole part of a whole

Which I am also its entirety

Therefore, there is no place

Science and God are not

The same goes for heaven and hell

There is no observable place for either

Save for what one makes of

Their situation at any moment





Presupposing a story or theory

To hang a hat on so that everything

That is told after it makes sense

Makes no sense

There is zero proof of

Creation or a big bang




It is much more valid to

Not only believe but prove

Everything exists

Infinitely forever while

Merely changing shape

Content and context as

The miracle in that alone

Ought to keep everyone

Animated in a state of awe

With God and Science or

Without God and Science




“Just an observation,
Maybe I need
Different glasses.”

– Angelo Devlin