1919 Debunked ?

Along time ago, wait it is as fresh as tomorrow.  I read an article that was very fascinating to me, at the ripe old age of nine, or so. Somewhere at the precipice of the age of reason, for sure.

 

With somewhat of an ominous tone, the headline read;

US Downfall Plotted 50 Years Ago

Whoa, kind of scary, when your Monday thru Friday indoctrination schedule includes the daily mantra of “Pledging” your “Allegiance” to the “Flag” and to the”Republic” for which it “Stands”. Plus probably repeating that at Cub Scouts.

Nooo, why would anyone want to plot against the US?

Wait, if a plot was discovered, then surely, like a Hardy Boys mystery, it can be foiled. After all, here it is in print for all hard working loyal Americans to see and take counter measures.

All anybody would have to do is be aware of this and take appropriate actions, by not letting themselves get duped or let America fall into this now easily avoidable catastrophe.

Must be careful though, certainly if I run around screaming the warning to all that can hear, might deem me as a little crazy and not listen. Worse yet, if I mention this discovered plot to someone I don’t know or trust, they might be one of the plotters and do something to me, so I can’t warn anyone else.

Going to have to act alone, and lead by example and practically memorize the points and be aware of not participating in unconsciously helping my beloved country go bad. What a task for a nine year old.

 

 

Here is the transcribed article below, that can be found on Google as well.

Of course, now it is from 50 years ago.

 

 

US Downfall Plotted 50 Years Ago 

In May of 1919 at Dussoldorf Germany,  the Allied Forces obtained a copy of the “Communist Rules for Revolution”.

Nearly fifty years later, the “Reds” are still “following the rules”.  As you read the list, stop after each item and think about the present-day situation and where you live, and all around the nation. We quote from the Red Rules.

A.    Corrupt the young. Get them away from religion.  Get them interested in sex. Make them superficial; Destroy their ruggedness.

B.     Get control of all means of publicity thereby :

1.     Get people’s minds off their government, by focusing their attention on athletics, sexy books and plays and other trivialities.

2.     Divide the people into hostile groups by constantly harping on controversial matters of no importance.

3.     Destroy the people’s faith in their natural leaders, by holding the latter up to contempt, ridicule and obloquy.

4.     Always preach true democracy,  but seize power as fast and as ruthlessly as possible.

5.     By encouraging government extravagance, destroy its credit, produce fear of inflation with high prices and general discontent.

6.     Forment unnecessary strikes in vital industries, encourage civil disorders and foster a lenient and soft attitude on the part of government toward such disorders.

7.     By spacious argument, cause the breakdown of the old moral virtues, honesty, sobriety, continued faith in the pledged word, ruggedness.

C.     Cause the registration of all firearms on some pretext, with the view of confiscating them and leaving the population helpless.

That was quite a list, wasn’t it? Now stop and think, how many of those rules are being carried out in this nation today?  I don’t see how any thinking person can truthfully say that the communists do not have any part in the chaos, that is upsetting our nation.  Or is it just coincidence? I doubt it!

I had recently found the copy of the copy of that article. That is probably a bad reveal that I had hung on to it for this long, and although it had been vaguely filled away to obscurity it surfaced while looking for something else.

So in this age of Google, opted to see if there was any background info to it.

Typed in the title of the article in the search bar and voila, several copies of a the same article from various publishers. Guess the media distribution was a bit different in the late 60’s.

One of the things I found was that it’s source was debunked because there are no Communist Rules for Revolution. Or are there? Anyway, it doesn’t matter.

If you watch any documentary or movie from that era, the word communist could have easily been replaced by the word bogeyman. It would have meant the same thing.

Same goes for today, replace terrorism with bogeyman and you’ll see how easily the masses are being duped into being led and controlled.

Somehow it got attached to fear. See what McCarthyism did to this country. Blacklists, circumstantial covert repression of free speech. You can say whatever you want, however there is an underlying understanding that, perhaps if you do speak out, you may lose your family supporting income.

Then where would you be to protend a fight. For the most important thing (family) that you believe in, could face the hardships over a concept. Kind of like fighting for the principle of peace, it gets lost quick.

Whether it be by circumstance or design (Google Manufactured Consent) there are several things on the list worth examing.

A.    Corrupt the young. Get them away from religion.  Get them interested in sex. Make them superficial; Destroy their ruggedness.

A. The young are circumstantially, albeit unconsciously corrupted by their parents anyway. Usually in the form of “do as I say, not as I do” indoctrination. That or Santa Clause and the easy manipulation of you better behave, “a non-existent” invisible entity is watching your behavior, speech and thoughts. Just as a matter of control.

Sex, I’m sure that’s innate. Encouraging or discouraging that is hardly going to make a difference. Distracted by it, might more be the issue.

“Superficial.” Perhaps, not sure, at this point what is available to be “deep” about. Most everything is disposable, and / or easily replaced.

With the new use of the word “optics” might cover this one. A person’s character, being defined by what it is, that they appear to be doing, as opposed to their overall nature, personality and actual actions.

“Some aspects of destroying their “ruggedness”. Might not be such a bad thing as ruggedness can imply brutality. Excusable behavior justifying assault and violence.

B.     Get control of all means of publicity thereby :

Objectively points 1-7 seem relatively self explanatory. Just re-read the above then ponder them with eyes even halfway closed and you will see most are frighteningly accurate. Or perhaps this article has ingrained my paranoia for nearly fifty years.

C.     Cause the registration of all firearms on some pretext, with the view of confiscating them and leaving the population helpless.

Here is the most current kicker on display. But you have to pay real close attention to who is actually saying what. One side tells you that it the other side is going to take away guns. The other side can not defend words that did not come out of their mouth without using words that weren’t there in the first place. A catch twenty-two of sorts.

Leaving everyone up in arms over the first and second amendments. Ignoring the other twenty-five, if anyone knows they are there.

That was quite a list, wasn’t it? Now stop and think, how many of those rules are being carried out in this nation today?  I don’t see how any thinking person can truthfully say that the communists do not have any part in the chaos, that is upsetting our nation.  Or is it just coincidence? I doubt it!

.

Using the word communist is interchangeable with any moniker to isolate and identify an invisible moving human target, a most capable bogeyman.

If this article were to be written today they could use socialist.

The “ist” matters not, save for scaring the shit out of an unenlightened populace distracted by all of the distractions.

Everything including safety, security, patriotism, jingoism, war, peace, slavery, abortion, flag burning, walls, immigration, subpoenas, pardons, climate change, fake news, absolute proof, etc.

Each one of those distractions and any inadvertently left out each have within them hypocrisy, dichotomy or both.

Deep reservoirs, chock-full of empty opinions, arguments merely for the sake of arguing. Mindless, endless rhetoric built-up to collapse on itself.

Peace: The previous President received the Nobel peace prize whilst engaging simultaneously in two wars, and the collective accepted that in true Orwellian fashion.

War: The dictionary definition states it is fighting between groups or countries, when in truth everyone knows an original definition would have used the word killing. You know killing, aborting out of the womb oxygen breathing 68th trimester fetuses.

Each and every side burying and birthing over theology, geography or a product.

Foremost lately is the product or resources to make products thereby needing to make more humans, i.e.(products) to extract, form, mold, build, assemble, test, market, box, package, store, warehouse, distribute, buy, sell, waste, discard, restart and repeat. Those are just the descriptions, on the human “products”.

Alas, it matters not. This, now or then could have been another distraction in a dizzying deluge of distraction. ‘Tis one of the reasons I started this blog to communicate this in a clever way.

Building on it in drips and drabs, a way to explain my beingness and thought processes (or my paranoia) till I realized it was bumping up against the alleged article’s 100th anniversary.

At least, if it has not been either informative, entertaining or enlightening, then maybe it explains the nature of the rest of most of the posts on this blog. Would certainly explain my voraciousness for questioning everything.

Thanks for reading.