A New Beginning
Which is not really a beginning, rather a consciousness context changer.
“In the beginning the Word already existed. The Word was with God, and the Word was God.”
John 1:1
Hmmmmm
A follow-up to “Think Of A Word “
To get humanity out of its
Scientific / religious Ouroboros trap
The need to understand
There is no start
That does not have an inherent prequel
Starting with religion
Since assumably that is where
All of this nonsense started
Plus the “Holy” holey book
Has already been revised numerous times
Due to Kings, circumstances and whims
Interpretations and language translations
Hint: it wasn’t always in English, rather
Aramaic, Hebrew and Greek. Oopsie
I suspect one more time will not
Lose its lost purpose
Might even be worth another read
What if in either the book of
Genesis or John it is written as
“In the infinite the Word already existed. The Word was with God, and the Word was God.”
“In the beginning God created the heavens and the earth. Now the earth was formless and empty, darkness was over the surface of the deep, and the Spirit of God was hovering over the waters.”
Genesis 1 1-2
This might be a bit more tricky
In the infinite God/Word always exists. Neither Alpha or Omega, just IS. Now the earth was formless, just space dust coalescing into a habital planet. In what is known as the Goldilocks zone.
Briging rise to bipedal sentient beings formed out of a primordial ooze seeking consciousness of awareness and awareness of consciousness, that it may learn of words, to experience the whole through a subjective lens, while still being the whole.
Something like that
Science on the other hand
Is no better from a different direction
Trying to quantify a similar
Non existent beginning using God/Words
Like Big Bang Theory
While using a theory so indoctrinated
It gets confused with being a fact
When in reality it is a logical fallacy
By their own accounts
Firmly backing and proving E=mc2
E = mc2. It’s the world’s most famous equation, but what does it really mean? “Energy equals mass times the speed of light squared.” On the most basic level, the equation says that energy and mass (matter) are interchangeable; they are different forms of the same thing.
https://www.pbs.org › nova › einstein
So then, if everything exists always has
Merely changes shape via waves & particles
Why even bother with a contradictory theory
I am no scientist….. However
Their “proof” lies in absolutely no proof
Process would be a good God/Word
At no point is either energy or matter
Not in the God process of becoming the other
From growth comes decay and vice versa
From order to entropy and back again
Chickens come from eggs
Eggs come from chickens
Does it really matter Who’s On First?