Skip to content

Ill Logic

October 8, 2016

Trumped up crim in ill logic

The guise of the reality that we perceive to be living in is simply a decrepit system. One that in an instant,  could be altered by a paradigm shift.  (Still trying to figure out how to do that.)

I shouldn’t be wasting my time on this, however, this blog is about observing things and since I am only writing this blog for myself and am being amused, I guess I’m not wasting my time.

So self, here is my observation, since, if left in my head, looks like this.  Jhgft njgh ddwwg njhgfgj ljeqzx lpoijh nbvcs, etc…

Recently, one of the presidential candidates suggested that we get rid of all of the foreign criminals.

That sounds allright, however. that merely suggests that the home-grown criminals are okay.

I know I think too much, but how the f*** does that not get examined immediately, then disseminated to the dwindling masses who thinks that this guy could actually be president.

Between 1788 and 1868, approximately 162,000 convicts were transported by the British government to various penal colonies in Australia.[1]  Wikipedia 

Suprised,  that the moon has not yet been proposed, as the equivalent.

Why not, society wants to perceptibly push its problems far away, instead of actually “dealing” with them.


Bill Hicks “Australia”

The Australians,  I found out,  this is interesting, were the “criminal” class of Great Britain.

The Brit’s, in order to “punish” “them”, sent them to Australia. Their own prehistoric eden like island continent.


Besides the moon,  where else does the “Donald” think he can send “criminals” that they can’t get back from?

Just for fun, here is how you stop criminal behavior. Make everything legal. Or, or stop having criminals.  Based on the reality, (as I perceive it).

Criminals,  are not from another dimension (or perhaps they are).

Criminals,  essentially come from parents. Tracking down responsibility, leads there.  Therefore,  in that context, procreation is a criminal behavior.  The “green” movement,  may eventually “prove” that theory.

After all, so far, making something illegal has never ever prevented it from happening.  Quite frankly, seems only to be used to placate “religious” beliefs and to help the economy.

Why else, would there be a “for profit” penal system? Or a “belief” system, that also cashes in on perceived “penance”?

“Make everything legal” is just a theory, under contemplation,  working out the details as this is being disseminated on to this screen.

It is a fun chase, down the rabbit hole.

The contemplation,  of passing “legislation” to make everything “legal” is an irony within itself.

A little help from Ayn Rand

“Did you really think we want those laws observed?” said Dr. Ferris. “We want them to be broken. You’d better get it straight that it’s not a bunch of boy scouts you’re up against…

We’re after power and we mean it… There’s no way to rule innocent men. The only power any government has is the power to crack down on criminals.

Well, when there aren’t enough criminals one makes them. One declares so many things to be a crime that it becomes impossible for men to live without breaking laws.

Who wants a nation of law-abiding citizens? What’s there in that for anyone?

But just pass the kind of laws that can neither be observed nor enforced or objectively interpreted – and you create a nation of law-breakers – and then you cash in on guilt.

Now that’s the system, Mr. Reardon, that’s the game, and once you understand it, you’ll be much easier to deal with.”

― Ayn Rand, Atlas Shrugged

From → dark, humor, Paradox, Quotes, random

  1. The illogical political positions of many candidates and their followers is so profuse, it’s hard to take it all in and respond. We’d do nothing else. The staunch advocacy of “guns everywhere” is antithetical to half of their positions. My brother was murdered with a gun by a white, “Christian” American, and apparently, that doesn’t matter, or the murder was the acceptable kind of murder.


    • Sorry to hear about your brother. It is too bad the second ammendment is not interpreted that the right to bear arms, is in an out reached position, to give a fellow earthling a hug instead of using a weapon of “mass” destruction to eliminate said bi-ped.

      Same goes for the hypocrisy of making America safe from gun violence, all the while it being okay to eliminate “terrorists”. What if the whole planet was America, then what would they do.

      Thanks for your post.

      Liked by 1 person

      • Thanks for your reply. None of it makes sense so it’s hard to speculate what the future will bring. We just have to keep speaking out on the one hand and “hugging” with the other. 😀

        Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: