An Honest Debate

Would be refreshing

Not by those two nudnicks

Vying to be mass murderers

That’s not going to happen

After all deception is their

Key to seek and gain power

From what little I heard

Individual one was trying to

Win by sheer decibel levels

The other by triggering triggers

None of which collectively

Solve any problem but is rather a

Polished act for a live performance

To keep the masses

Glued to their seats

Pointing fingers at the clowns

Jugglers and jeremiad jesters

So the audience can later

Mean meme and tweet their

Selfish subjective opinion

As to how their “side” “won”

When clearly the audience does not win






There is no resolution in a debate

Watching the “presidential” debate

It is like watching verbal TicTacToe

Or children, with crayons at a restaurant

Playing the same winless game

(Anybody see “War Games”)

Occupying their time to behave

While waiting for the food to arrive





An honest debate would include

The meaning definition and purpose

Of the word honest and its value

Between a white lie and a “Big” lie


White Lies

• Told to protect others

• Self-protective

• Avoid awkward situations


Real Lies

• Told to benefit the self

• Self-serving

• Create pain and discomfort for others


– verywellmind.com



Plus, the “debate” ought to be more of a dialog

Between more than just two people

Having a harangue for no sake

The perception and perspective change

Depending on who is using honest and why



The group could include politicians, lawyers

Insurance executives and preschool children



Honest

1 a: free from fraud or deception

– M-W.com



My guess is that the preschool children

Would have the most refreshing and refined

Un – indoctrinated view of the key meaning





 “A strange game.

The only winning move is not to play.

How about a nice game of chess?”

– “Joshua”

“War Games”