Dueling Dichotomies

Within dissimilar groups

Opposing each other



Unapologetically ironic

When murder is involved



Pro-Choice vs. Pro-Life


It is technically difficult to classify either as being a side, since half of each, actually “belong” to the other.

Both playing the role of pseudo-gods in their divine and dastardly decision making.

On one hand, you have those whose moniker gives them the linguistic advantage of being Pro-life. (Right to lifer’s) Because the understood opposite suggests, their nemesis is Pro-death. Also, under that umbrella, get to use that tricky little word.

“Right”

11 b : being in a correct or proper state

M-W.com

Again, defaulting to the other “side” as being “wrong” not just, left.

“These people call themselves “right to lifers.” Don’t you love that phrase? And don’t you love the way these kind of people pervert the English language?

You realize that most of the right-to-lifers are in favor of the DEATH penalty? And they support the South American DEATH squads. (Russians killing Ukrainians. Disgruntled employees and sensation starved sapiens to have, way too easy of access to WMD’s. A.K.A AK-47’s and AR-15’s)

And they’re against gun control and they’re against nuclear weapons control.

When they say “right to life,” they’re talking about “THEIR” right to decide which people should live or die.”

– George Carlin

Unfortunately Pro-Life is more of a ruse to cover for being Pro-birth. As typically, the life they are “saving” isn’t worth the money it could be paying to actually nurture, care, educate and provide.

“Pro-life conservatives are obsessed with the fetus from conception to nine months. After that, they don’t want to know about you. They don’t want to hear from you. No nothing. No neonatal care, no day care, no head start, no school lunch, no food stamps, no welfare, no nothing. If you’re preborn, you’re fine;……………………. if you’re preschool, you’re fucked.”

– George Carlin

The other side, gets to hide behind the euphemistic language of murder, by using the softer more convenient word of abortion. (Sounds like what NASA does, when conditions aren’t right, to launch a rocket. Same situation different analogy.)

This hides the double standard of military type language, by killing unarmed civilians and labeling them…..collateral damage. Ooopsie.

Funny though, how the “Pro-Choice” people, get to balance their moral high ground, of autonomy by standing on a sinking patch of quicksand by being against the death penalty. Saving people who may have committed heinous crimes from pre-planned scheduled, preventable deaths. Ooopsie.

Yet, if one considers the hypnotic research that Helen Wambach performed in “Life Before Life”, of discovering that the soul doesn’t permanently attach itself to the vehicle until right before birth. The extraction of taking the car off the lot before it can be sold, seems a fairly reasonable decision, made by the owner of the lot.

I know I kicked the tires of my vehicle, and while it is not the fastest, or shiniest, it is getting me, where I need to be. At least before I get out, to select another vehicle for the next trip.

If consistency and logic came into play, the Pro-life people would be advocating for saving fetuses and murderers, making sure they were taken care of outside of their “cell” walls. Doing everything from once they get here, to preventing them from getting where they might have gone. Methinks, that is what Jesus would have done.

Right off the bat, you would think everyone would automatically be in this group. Since the alternative would be Pro-Choice people supporting both pre to post natal abortions, murdering Jay walkers for unauthorized crossing of streets. An exaggeration perhaps, yet consistent with each’s primary focus. If one chooses to break the law, then technically have chosen to pay the consequences.

Also, it boots out the religious and racist part of the former, since it would be a collective humanitarian issue of saving all fetuses regardless of their in or out of womb status, what invisible man, they have been indoctrinated into believing in, or what color their skin might be.

However this is not the case, just more fodder for keeping people fighting with each other, since all and any death is inevitable anyway.

The nice part of their inconsistent charters, is where both “sides” agree on acceptable death, is war. The economic engine driving both busses. Fear, death, destruction, weapons, body bags, isms, ideologies, territories, energy resources, and it’s fun to watch.

“I don’t mind about the war, it’s one of the things I like to watch, if it is a war going on. ‘Cause then I know then, if our side is winning, if our side is losing.”


Roger Waters

“What God Wants, part 1”

From “Amused To Death”


Any “casualty” will satiate their bloodthirst. Anything to display a flag draped coffin to elicit patriotism of the poor into a pseudo righteous duty to serve. Not to defend democracy, but to hijack energy resources to keep fueling the busses. Under the well worn guise / cliché of allegedly defending democracy.


“Just an observation,
Maybe I need
Different glasses.”

– Angelo Devlin